Saratoga Investment Corp. Announces Fiscal First Quarter 2016 Financial Results; Further Increases Quarterly Dividend to $0.33 from $0.27 per share
NEW YORK, July 14, 2015 – Saratoga Investment Corp. (NYSE:SAR) (“Saratoga Investment” or “the Company”), a business development company, today announced financial results for its 2016 fiscal first quarter.
Summary Financial Information:
- Net investment income on a weighted average per share basis of $0.33 for the quarter ended May 31, 2015. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the net investment income on a weighted per share basis was $0.53, an increase of $0.13, or 33% from the quarter ended May 31, 2014.
- Net investment income of $1.8 million for the quarter ended May 31, 2015. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the net investment income was $2.9 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 33% from the quarter ended May 31, 2014.
- Net investment income yield as percentage of average net asset value (“Net Investment Income Yield”) was 5.8% for the quarter ended May 31, 2015. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the Net Investment Income Yield was 9.3%, an increase of 180 bps from the quarter ended May 31, 2014.
- Return on equity for the quarter ended May 31, 2015 was 24.0%.
- Earnings per share for the quarter ended May 31, 2015 was $1.36, an increase of $1.03 or 312% from the quarter ended May 31, 2014.
- Net asset value (“NAV”) was $123.5 million as of May 31, 2015, an $8.3 million increase from an NAV of $115.2 million as of May 31, 2014.
- NAV per share was $22.75 as of May 31, 2015, compared to $21.41 as of May 31, 2014.
- Investment portfolio activity for the quarter ended May 31, 2015:
- Cost of investments made during the period: $23.2 million
- Principal repayments during the period: $7.3 million
Explore the World of Comics with Me
Recently, I let you all know about my passion for both my home countries, the U.S. and South Africa. In addition to blogging about CFO and South Africa related issues, I also have an immense love for comic books. Like many, I continue to grab up comics just as I did when I was younger. I may not have as much free time as I did when I was a kid, but I still read my favorite stories whenever possible.
In celebration of my lifelong interest, I began blogging about all things comics. Whether you are a fan like myself, or just interested in the exquisite art that’s been created over the years, please visit my blog.
From the early days of the Silver Surfer to barely containing excitement for the next season of Daredevil–featuring The Punisher!!–I like to cover a bit of it all. My hope is that current fans can find another outlet for incredible comic content, while maybe opening eyes for a few potential fans in the process.
I’d love if you headed over and let me know what you think.
The Evolution of the CFO Role Impacts Careers, Job Candidates
A recent Deloitte sponsored article in the Wall Street Journal covered the evolution of the CFO position and the ensuing revised search criteria companies employ when searching for qualified candidates. In the article, they speak with chairman of executive recruiting at Crist/Kolder Associates, Peter Crist. What Crist had to say expanded on a small section of the CFO landscape I touched on in recent weeks. His views certainly echo that of a large amount of the boardroom community.
Crist notes that trends in varying sectors of the industry brought us to this point in the field’s evolution. In short, the role of a CFO is changing. These changes helped prompt several CFOs to take early exits or retirements, often in their late 50s rather than the norm in their early 60s.
A factor in the evolution is one that I covered in my article, shareholder activism. Shareholder activism is a driving factor in a growing number of CFOs stepping away. Even CFOs capable of weathering shareholder activist storms may find themselves suddenly under qualified for certain public companies because of revised strategies from the board–especially with publically traded companies. This increased involvement from the board certainly can be helpful when executed properly. However, if mismanaged the “involved board” approach could drive a qualified CFO out the door.
Another interesting point Crist mentioned was that of the roughly 670 Fortune 500 and S&P 500 companies Crist/Kolder Associates surveyed found that turnover at the position is at about 15 percent. A key reason for the high turnover is due to the aforementioned early retirement. Crist notes that the increased expectations, focusing on strategy and operations on an already taxing position, have countless CFOs pondering if it is more beneficial to simply cash in and enjoy an early retirement.
Granted, these findings and results only come from one professional and their company. However, evidence suggests that the evolution will remain for at least some time. Regardless if you agree with the findings or not, Crist’s findings are worth pondering for your own job and/or company.
Come Learn About the Countries I Call Home
As some of my readers may know, in addition to blogging on this website I also have a passion for writing about my home country, South Africa. I love to bring both of my homelands into the spotlight as much as possible. Furthermore, I enjoy pointing out some of the similarities both nations and its people share. Both have such rich histories that demonstrate the determination and progress of humanity and culture as a whole, even through troubling eras.
While I love discussing lighter topics like the wine cultures and the perception of sharks in each country, sensitive issues do sometimes come to light unfortunately. In recent weeks, a rise in xenophobic actions by some in South Africa prompted me to start profiling the standout deeds of people and communities in spite of the ugliness perpetrated by others. In the last few weeks I compared interesting subjects where the U.S. and South Africa stand. Early topics have included GDP and each nation’s environmental issues. While each country offers vastly different strengths, weaknesses and concerns you also notice the similarities each nation has faced and currently worries over.
I can’t wait to delve into the comparisons more in the coming weeks. If you have a topic you want to see covered, please leave a comment and I will do my best to cover it in the near future. I hope you will enjoy learning a thing or two about my incredible home country, as well as the United States.
Saratoga Investment Corp. to Report Fiscal First Quarter 2016 Financial Results and Hold Conference Call
NEW YORK, June 22, 2015 – Saratoga Investment Corp. (NYSE:SAR) will report its financial results for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2015 on July 14, 2015, after market close. A conference call to discuss the financial results will be held on July 15, 2015. Details for the conference call are provided here.
Who
Christian L. Oberbeck, Chief Executive Officer
Michael J. Grisius, President and Chief Investment Officer
Henri J. Steenkamp, Chief Financial Officer
When
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET)
How
Call: Interested parties may participate by dialing (877) 312-9208 (U.S. and Canada) or (678) 224-7872 (outside U.S. and Canada).
A replay of the call will be available from 1:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 through 11:59 p.m. ET on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 by dialing (855) 859-2056 (U.S. and Canada) or (404) 537-3406 (outside U.S. and Canada), passcode for both replay numbers: 71900179.
Webcast: Interested parties may access a simultaneous webcast of the call and find the Q1 2016 presentation by going to the “Events & Presentations” section of Saratoga Investment Corp.’s investor relations website, http://www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com/investor.html
Information
Saratoga Investment Corp.’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2015 will be filed on July 14, 2015 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
How to Manage Risk Inside and Outside the BDC
Since its arrival in the 1980s, business development companies (BDC) have developed into a growing, but niche sector of investment. Emerging from the financial crisis a few years ago, BDCs began to shift to make decisions that would avoid such a situation arising once again. However, BDCs are still risk takers at its core. It’s what makes them BDCs to a certain degree. Unfortunately, that may mean that some will go too far with its risk assessment. That doesn’t have to be the case, though, for you and your BDC.
With wise risk management and leadership able to weather most situations, BDCs are generally well-equipped for making educated risks that generate gains for all parties. Whether they be internal, external or a composite risk, the best BDCs are prepared to do what is right after the proper preparation and assessment.
When it comes to risks, these are just some of what the sector faces:
External Risks
When it comes to risks arising outside the BDC, management has little to no control over what can be done. However, these risks can be anticipated to a certain degree–creating a safety net of sorts for the company and its portfolio.
The public sector is certainly a driving force in creating risky scenarios a BDC must evaluate. The vagaries of the market, as well as individual sentiments, can alter the course of a well-thought out plan of action relatively quickly. While possible to anticipate, no one can be certain when a loan extension is requested. On the flip side, companies sometime do so well they want to repay their loans early, which is sometimes the penalty for investing in good companies. Worse for the BDC, a company deciding to restructure can derail any plans that had previously been laid out.
By doing its “homework” of sorts, a BDC understands the type of company it is investing in. Thorough vetting allows the company to truly understand if the risk is too high to get involved with. Each BDC must have a plan in place to meet these concerns while remaining flexible to each individual entity. Additionally, just as investing in a BDC isn’t right for every investor, not all companies are right for a BDC. Even though BDCs often say “maybe” when banks say “no,” we often say no as well.
By properly overseeing the BDC as well as understanding its portfolio, the company puts itself in a position to succeed more often than not on those high-risk investments. In the end, these risks are largely about risk assessment and evaluation. After that, it falls largely on anticipating new circumstances and remaining open to new ideas.
Internal Risks
Obviously, internal risk management is much easier to anticipate and plan for than the external. With a fundamental understanding of the BDC and its portfolio, a proper leader knows what is needed to grow or keep your company thriving. This should be an obvious answer to most people reading this. However, actions by certain BDCs in the past may leave some wondering if these points are as obvious as they may seem.
For those that have veered off the path, there are several aspects to evaluate when seeing where improvements can be made. At its core, people risk and corporate culture are vital to success in every facet. If your BDC lacks in quality staffers, all bets are off when it comes to managing risks. In fact, those less than ideal staffers can cause the internal problems you have been avoiding all this time. Whether it be a fragmented workforce or a lack in core business components, those not operating under company ethos can cause significant risk and harm to the business. With a unified vision and corporate culture in place, this shouldn’t become an issue at your BDC.
Other key internal risks BDCs have to look out for include market assessment, as well as intelligence and portfolio management. These risks can include reading the market’s trends, identifying gaps in the market and maintaining a balanced portfolio. A lack in quality employees often results in these errors coming to light. With quality and unified employees in place, the BDC is set up for proactive success that is more than capable in assessing risks and potential problems that may arise.
Composite Risks
There are three main risks that come to mind when assessing composite risks. The first would be where your BDC stands with commercial relationships. These sorts of risks include understanding what makes an appropriate partner, communication from both parties and what is the level of viable candidates for partnership in a particular sector. Your BDC can only do so much to prepare for these factors, but all that due diligence will certainly leave it in prime position to make the most educated decisions it can–even if the circumstances are far from ideal.
Additionally, investor understanding is vital to managing composite risks. Knowing market trends, individual investment opportunities and an ability to differentiate between companies and sub-sectors are just the tip of the composite risk iceberg. Investor understanding requires having the brightest talent possible on your staff, as I mentioned in the internal risks section. With a capable staff in place, a BDC is once again poised to make the wisest decision for the company and its portfolio.
Lastly, the public’s perception of your company can drive risk like nothing else. Not only can public perception leave your BDC in shambles, it can just as easily promote it to one of the sector’s most revered businesses. That’s why everything from portfolio selection to pricing to investing in a potentially divisive industry could negatively impact your BDC. And of course, even after taking all the appropriate measures to avoid these pitfalls, a long list of circumstances could occur on your investment’s side of the business.
How to Manage the Risks
As I’ve stated above, having a unified team of intelligent business leaders should set you on the right path to avoiding most of these problems. Regardless of the risk type, proper preparation should be your BDC’s first step in combating these problems. Once that is in place, your company should be able to understand the risks to the best possible degree. And while nothing is a guaranteed success or failure, these measures will certainly put you in place to make the best possible decisions on even the riskiest subject.
Shareholder Activism Shapes CFO Searches
I recently came across an insightful interview with Joel von Ranson, lead of executive recruiter Spencer Stuart’s Financial Officer of North American practices. He notes how shareholder activism is impacting the boardroom, especially when it comes to CFO searches. Shareholder activism, or when a shareholder uses their ownership rights to sway leadership or business, has risen in recent years.
While the rise in demand for ethical business practices is welcome, other forms of shareholder activism do not need to reach the critical mass levels they reach in some instances. With a proactive person at the helm, these large scale issues reduce to issues that get resolved with effective communication. That is where the new bar for CFO searches takes us.
The public business sector is evolving to meet these new pressures and demands. With that means a company’s CFO must be capable to hit the ground running as a successful leader and right-hand-person to the CEO. If an untested CFO is to assume the role, they run a higher risk of allowing these issues to boil over.
Instead, von Ranson and other industry leaders note that public companies are turning to the battle tested CFOs–the ones that can take the heat in the proverbial kitchen. But it’s not just that they can stand the heat. They thrive in it, making proactive decisions that set the company on course for success with a clearly laid out plan to the board. If we were to stick with the metaphor, a viable CFO makes the heat work for them.
von Ranson went on to explain in his interview that, “While shareholder activism certainly puts more pressure on CFOs, it’s also elevating the strategic role of the CFO and is giving the CFO a more prominent voice on the leadership team and in the boardroom.” With that prominent voice a CFO can lead with articulate plans that mirror the company’s strategy and explain value proposition to the board. By having these two skills in place, the CFO isn’t just walking the walk of a CFO, they are literally talking the talk.
Beyond talking, it’s the action that differentiates who is a top flight CFO for this position. In a proactive versus reactive setting, the proactive leader will be able to anticipate the needs and wants of all applicable parties. This comes in two key forms.
In terms of working with the CEO, a proactive CFO makes sure that the numbers are understood inside and out. By having the numbers on their mind, the CFO ensures the CEO that they are able to focus on other key aspects of the business while the figures remain taken care of by another trusted leader in the company.
When working with the board, a proactive CFO is keenly aware of the concerns and questions they will face during periods of scrutiny. A more successful CFO understands their investor audience. Beyond understanding them, they also manage that audience in a fair and respectful manner. The CFO never railroads a question or point, but rather leads it to the key points. It’s never used to pander, but rather to remain a step or two more prepared than everyone else.
If you are an aspiring CFO looking to break into the public sector, you may face a tougher road than what was once laid before you. Conversely, if you are a seasoned leader in the public sector, von Ranson suggests that you use all these points to enhance your own standing. Your experience is always welcomed during a job search. But when the landscape is shifting towards proven leaders, no time is better to accentuate every credential you have.
The Moral Compass of Business and Humanity
Apple CEO Tim Cook’s recent commencement speech at George Washington University went viral as Cook urged graduates to follow their values while pursuing a career that helps do good for the world. After citing his personal inspirations that included Martin Luther King Jr., Robert Kennedy and Jimmy Carter, Cook went on to elaborate about compromising his own values. That included a time as a young boy where he shook hands with then-Alabama governor, and noted segregation proponent, George Wallace. Cook felt he betrayed his own moral code, something he didn’t experience when shaking hands with the aforementioned President Carter.
Each person’s own values should represent who they are as individuals every day. While some in the business world fail to demonstrate that, a good business does. Staying on the path of a moral compass often brings increased business and positive attention to the organization. Furthermore, it will often make the company more desirable to investors looking for a quality addition to their portfolios.
For the full article visit Medium.
Saratoga Announces Fiscal Year End and 4th Quarter 2015 Financial Results
Saratoga Investment Corp. today announced financial results for its 2015 fiscal year end and fourth quarter.
Here are some of the financial highlights:
- Net investment income on a weighted average per share basis of $1.80 and $0.53 for the year and quarter ended February 28, 2015, respectively. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the net investment income on a weighted per share basis was $1.85 and $0.50, respectively.
- Net investment income of $9.7 million and $2.9 million for the year and quarter ended February 28, 2015, respectively. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the net investment income was $10.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
- Net investment income yield as percentage of average net asset value (“Net Investment Income Yield”) was 8.2% and 9.5% for the year and quarter ended February 28, 2015, respectively. Adjusted for the incentive fee accrual related to net unrealized capital gains, the Net Investment Income Yield was 8.5% and 8.8%, respectively.
- Return on equity for the year and quarter ended February 28, 2015 was 9.3% and 8.9%, respectively.
- Earnings per share for the year and quarter ended February 28, 2015 was $2.04 and $0.50, respectively.
- Net asset value (“NAV”) was $122.6 million as of February 28, 2015, a $9.2 million increase from a NAV of $113.4 million as of February 28, 2014.
- NAV per share was $22.70 as of February 28, 2015, compared to $21.08 as of February 28, 2014.
- Investment portfolio activity for the year ended February 28, 2015
- Cost of investments made during the period: $104.9 million
- Principal repayments during the period: $73.3 million
- Investment portfolio activity for the quarter ended February 28, 2015
- Cost of investments made during the period: $20.9 million
- Principal repayments during the period: $20.5 million
Saratoga Investment Corp. Files Annual Form 10-K With SEC
On May 20, Saratoga Investment Corp. filed their Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Although simply named, the Form 10-K is actually a fairly comprehensive and complex report that companies must file with the SEC each year to share their financial details and financial performance. The 10-K includes audited financial statements, equity, and subsidiaries, but also other information like company history, risk factors, executive compensation, and more.
In this year’s Form 10-K, Saratoga makes a number of forward-looking statements about its future operating results, the impact of intended investments, business prospects, contractual relationships, expected financings and investments, and more.